પ્રશ્નો સરકાર ને, ખુલાસો સત્તા પક્ષ દ્વારા શું કામ?

જ્યારે જ્યારે સરકારને પ્રશ્નો પૂછવામાં આવે છે ત્યારે સરકારના મંત્રી, ઓફિસરો કે સરકારી પ્રવક્તા ને બદલે સતા પક્ષના પ્રવક્તા ખુલાસો કે જવાબ શું કામ આપે છે?

સરકાર ના કાર્યો નો ખુલાસો કરવાની જવાબદારી સરકારની નથી?

જો સરકાર દ્વારા મૌખિક કે લેખિત ખુલાસા કે જવાબ જો ખોટા કે ભૂલ ભરેલ હોય તો જે તે મંત્રી કે ઓફિસરો સામે પગલાં લઈ શકાય છે.

પરંતુ સત્તા પક્ષ દ્વારા કરવામાં આવેલ ખુલાસો સરકારને બંધનકર્તા નથી. અને સરકારને કરેલ પ્રશ્નોનો ખુલાસો કરતી વખતે સત્તા પક્ષના પ્રવક્તા દ્વારા કરવામાં ખોટો કે અધૂરો હોય તો પણ જે તે પક્ષ ની કોઈ જવાબદારી નથી થતી.

વળી જ્યારે સત્તા પક્ષ ના પ્રવક્તા ખુલાસો કરે ત્યારે વિરોધ પક્ષ પર આક્ષેપો કરી વાત આસાની થી ફેરવી નાખે છે.

જેથી સરકાર ને કરવામાં આવેલ પ્રશ્નોનો જવાબ સરકારે જ આપવાનો રહે છે અને સત્તા પક્ષ દ્વારા કરવામાં આવેલ ખુલાસો સ્વીકારવા પાત્ર રહેતો નથી.

Avoidance of questions by the government!

When questions are asked to the government for their functions, why the ruling party responds and clarifies instead?

Isn’t it the role and duty of the respective minister, officials or government spokesperson.

Because any explanation or clarification is given by the ruling party’s spokesperson is not binding on the government and for any misinformation the ruling party is not liable.

Moreover when the ruling party’s spokesperson clarifies he or she would likely include allegation on the oppositions about the time during their rule and would easily distract the debate.

Therefore any questions are asked to the government, must be dealt and responded by the government.

Gujarat Case Flow Management Rules for Subordinate Courts

The Gujarat High Court Case Flow Management (Subordinate Courts) Rules,2016 has been introduced with intent to curb the infamous delay in litigation. These rules are applicable to all civil, criminal and labour courts.

The rules provide for categorization of all cases in four tracks (i.e. Track I to Track IV) with prescribed time period allowed for cases in for respective tracks (i.e. for Track I, 9 months ;for Track IV, 24 months).

The rules provide various small and subtle new procedures which may help to restrict litgants in making delays and allow the courts to have better control in administration of filing and listing of cases.

Most importantly the rules provide fixed time period for each type of cases and the sub-ordinate courts are meant to complete cases in the given time frame and when delay is being caused, sufficient reasons are to be recorded for such delay.

One of the effective rule appears to be of awarding of cost. The rule on cost provides that awarding of cost must be generally treated as mandatory and costs should invariably follow the event and special reasons must be assigned if cost is not being awarded.

However, this is not first time when an effort is made to expedite the procedures , but previous efforts were not effective because many reasons and lack of infrastructures and staff are the main reasons for the delays. These reasons still remain as the hindrance for the proper execution of another effort for speedy trial.
 

It’s not a joke :

What’s the difference between a good lawyer and a bad lawyer?

A bad lawyer can let a case drag out for several years. A good lawyer can make it last even longer

Scattered thoughts

Tags

, ,

Whenever any complaint by public is filed/reported against any government servant/officer, superior officer or ministry is not likely to take any action against such officer/servant. However, such complaints are kept in record to be used against such officer/servant if he is likely to cause harm to superior officer/ministry/government.

In various government organisation /departments date of death of employee/officer are noted by corrupt officers in their diary. In future whenever any misdeed is reported then name of such dead employee/officer is used as having handled/conducted such matter/file as to lead investigation to an dead end.